Late Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Possible to Recognize Risk Factors?

Authors

  • Claudio Ricci Department of Surgical and Anesthesiological Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, “S.Orsola-Malpighi” Hospital. Bologna, Italy
  • Riccardo Casadei Department of Surgical and Anesthesiological Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, “S.Orsola-Malpighi” Hospital. Bologna, Italy
  • Salvatore Buscemi Department of Surgical and Anesthesiological Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, “S.Orsola-Malpighi” Hospital. Bologna, Italy
  • Francesco Minni Department of Surgical and Anesthesiological Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, “S.Orsola-Malpighi” Hospital. Bologna, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/622

Keywords:

Pancreatectomy, Hemorrhage, Pancreatic Fistula

Abstract

Context Post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage is one of the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Objective To evaluate the late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage rate according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria and to recognize factors related to its onset. Methods A prospective study of 113 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy was conducted. Late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage was defined according to the criteria of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological data were considered and related to late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Results Thirty-one (27.4%) patients had a post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Twenty-five (22.1%) patients developed late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage: 19 (16.8%) grade B, 6 (5.3%) grade C. Surgical re-operation was performed in 2 out of the 25 cases with late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (8.0%) grade C associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula. At univariate analysis, the only factor significantly related to late post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage was postoperative pancreatic fistula (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis underlined that the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula (P<0.001) and pancreatic anastomosis (P=0.049) independently increased the risk of late hemorrhage. Conclusion In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, the criteria introduced by International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery to define late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage are related to a higher incidence of hemorrhage than previously detected because they considered also mild hemorrhage.


Downloads

References

Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC et al. National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1798-1805

Yoshioka R, Saiura A, Koga R, et al. Risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 patients. World J Surg 2010;34:121-125.

Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(2):269-80.

Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu S et al. Coil embolization of bleeding visceral pseudoaneurysms following pancreatectomy: the importance of early angiography. Arch Surg. 1998;133:1099-102.

Balladur P, Christophe M, Tiret E et al. Bleeding of the pancreatic stump following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43:268 -270.

Halloran CM, Ghaneh P, Bosonnet L et al. Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg. 2002;19:138 -146.

Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20-25.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213

Sidi A, Lobato EB, Cohen JA. The American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status: Category V Revisited. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12:328-34.

Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8-13.

Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg 2002;183:283-5.

Rajarathinam G, Kannan DG, Vimalraj V et al. Post pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage: outcome prediction based on new ISGPS Clinical severity grading. HPB 2008;10(5):363-70.

Sanjay P, Fawzi A, Fulke JL et al. Late post pancreatectomy haemorrhage. Risk factors and modern management. JOP. 2010;5;11(3):220-225.

Eckardt AJ, Klein F, Adler A, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Warnick P, Bahra M, Wiedenmann B, Neuhaus P, Neumann K, Glanemann M. Management and outcomes of haemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy. Br J Surg 2011;98:1599-1607.

Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS et al. Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:186-191.

Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Fukuzawa K et al. Risk factors for and management of delayed intraperitoneal hemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery. Am J Surg 2007;193:454-459.

Rumstadt B, Schwab M, Korth P. Haemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1998;227:236-241.

Brodsky JT, Turnbull AD. Arterial hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. The ‘sentinel bleed’. Arch Surg 1991;126:1037-40.

S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna. Bologna, Italy

Downloads

Published

2012-03-10

How to Cite

Ricci, C., Casadei, R., Buscemi, S., & Minni, F. (2012). Late Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Possible to Recognize Risk Factors?. JOP. Journal of the Pancreas, 13(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/622

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>